目的 系统评估癌症患者家属视角下安宁疗护质量评估工具的测量学特性及方法学质量，为医护人员选择高质量的评估工具提供循证依据。 方法 系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库中癌症患者家属视角下安宁疗护质量评估工具的相关研究，检索时限为建库至2023年12月8日。使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准评定纳入研究的方法学质量及评估工具的测量学特性，形成最终的推荐意见。结果 共纳入14篇文献，涉及5个评估工具，分别为照护评估量表（care elevation scale，CES）、照护评估量表2.0版（care evaluation scale version 2.0， CES 2.0）、良好死亡清单（good death inventory，GDI）、患者家属满意度问卷（family satisfaction with advanced cancer care-2，FAMCARE-2）、临终照护评估工具（care of the dying evaluation，CODE）。其中，GDI、FAMCARE-2、CODE为B级推荐；CES为C级推荐，CES 2.0为A级推荐。 结论 经综合评定后，CES 2.0可被暂时推荐使用，但仍需进一步验证其测量学特性。

Objective To systematically evaluate the measurement characteristics and methodological quality of hospice quality assessment tools from the perspective of cancer patients’ family members，and to provide evidence-based basis for medical staff to select high-quality assessment tools.Methods PubMed，Embase，Web of Science，CINAHL，CNKI，Wanfang，and VIP were systematically searched for studies on the hospice quality assessment tools from the perspective of cancer patients’ family members.The time was from the inceptions to December 8，2023.Consensus-based standards were used for assessing the methodological quality of included studies and the measurement properties of the assessment tools to form final recommendations.Results A total of 14 articles were included，involving 5 assessment tools，including care elevation scale (CES)，care evaluation scale version 2.0 (CES 2.0)，good death inventory (GDI)，family satisfaction with advanced cancer care-2 (FAMCARE-2) and care of the dying evaluation (CODE).Among them，GDI，FAMCARE-2 and CODE are B-level recommendations.CES is a level C recommendation and CES 2.0 is a level A recommendation.Conclusions After a comprehensive evaluation，CES 2.0 can be provisionally recommended for use，but its measurement characteristics need to be further verified.

R473

浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2022KY089)