目的 修订繁体版老年人身体复原力量表（physical resilience instrument for older adults，PRIFOR），并在老年膝骨性关节炎患者中进行信效度检验，以期为老年膝骨性关节炎患者身体复原力评估提供有效测量工具。方法 通过专家咨询和预调查对繁体版PRIFOR进行修订，采用便利抽样法选取河南省2所三级甲等医院的老年膝骨性关节炎患者398名为研究对象进行问卷调查，评价简体中文版PRIFOR的信度和效度。结果 简体中文版PRIFOR包含16个条目，条目内容效度指数0.833~1.000，量表内容效度为0.906；探索性因子分析提取3个公因子，累计方差贡献率为72.526%；验证性因子模型拟合度较好；与Barthel指数量表的相关系数为0.730（P＜0.01）。量表总Cronbach’s α系数为0.935，总折半信度为0.895，重测信度为0.926。结论 简体中文版PRIFOR信度效度较好，适用于我国老年膝骨性关节炎患者身体复原力的评估。

Objective To revise the traditional Chinese version of the physical resilience instrument for older adults (PRIFOR) and to test its reliability and validity among elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis，and to provide an effective measurement tool for the assessment of physical resilience(PR) in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis.Methods The traditional Chinese version of PRIFOR was revised through expert consultation and pre-survey.398 elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis from 2 tertiary A hospitals in Henan Province were selected by convenience sampling method for questionnaire survey，and the reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of PRIFOR was evaluated.Results The simplified Chinese version of PRIFOR contained 16 items，the content validity index of the items was 0.833-1.000，and the content validity of the scale was 0.906.Three common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis，and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 72.526%.The fitting degree of confirmatory factor model is good.The correlation coefficient with Barthel index scale was 0.730 (P＜0.01).The total Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.935，the total broken half reliability was 0.895，and the retest reliability was 0.926.Conclusions The simplified Chinese version of PRIFOR has good reliability and validity and is suitable for assessing the PR of elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis in China.

R473.59

河南大学青年交叉基金项目(S23060Y)