[关键词]
[摘要]
目的 构建长期照护人员分级评价指标体系,为不同层级照护人员的准入、考核与培训提供参考。方法 通过文献回顾和半结构访谈初拟长期照护人员分级评价指标,采用德尔菲法进行2轮函询,采用层次分析法计算指标权重。结果 长期照护员评价指标体系包括5个一级指标,17个二级指标,85个三级指标;照护师评价指标体系包括5个一级指标,19个二级指标,73个三级指标;照护督导评价指标体系包括5个一级指标,17个二级指标,59个三级指标。2轮专家积极系数为100%、95%,专家权威系数为0.863、0.862,肯德尔和谐系数为0. 064,0. 171(均P<0.001)。结论 构建的长期照护人员分级评价体系具有科学性和可靠性,可为长期照护人员的分级考核与培训提供参考。
[Key word]
[Abstract]
Objective To construct a grading evaluation indicator system for long-term caregivers,so as to provide references for the admission,assessment,and training of them at different levels.Methods Through literature review and semi-structured interviews,the evaluation indicator system for long-term caregivers was initially constructed,and the Delphi method was used to execute 2 rounds of inquiry.The analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weights of indicators.Results The grading evaluation indicators system of long-term caregivers included 5 first-level indicators,17 second-level indicators,and 85 third-level indicators; that of senior caregivers included 5 first-level indicators, 19 second-level indicators, and 73 third-level indicators; that of tutoring caregivers included 5 first-level indicators, 17 second-level indicators, and 59 third-level indicators. The expert positivity coefficient of 2 rounds were 100% and 95%,the expert authority coefficients of 2 rounds 0.863 and 0.862,respectively,and the Kendall’s W coefficients 0.064 and 0.171(all P<0.001).Conclusions The grading evaluation indicator system is scientific and reliable,which can provide reference for the grading assessment and training of long-term caregivers.
[中图分类号]
R473.2
[基金项目]
国家自然科学基金(72074164);老年长期照护教育部重点实验室项目